Martinez et al v. SN Servicing Corporation et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
ADAM MARTINEZ, et al,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SN SERVICING
CORPORATION, et al,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO
4:25-cv-01270
JUDGE CHARLES ESKRIDGE
ORDER ADOPTING
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiffs Adam Martinez, Hugo Cervantes, Raquel
Vega Cervantes Martinez, Antonio Escamilla Martinez,
and Nyeli Biana Escamilla proceed here pro se. They filed
a motion to remand. Dkt 4.
This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Yvonne
Ho. Pending is a Memorandum and Recommendation
recommending that the motion to remand be denied
because (i) subject matter jurisdiction is proper based on
both federal question and diversity jurisdiction, and
(ii) removal was procedurally proper. See Dkt 60.
The district court reviews de novo those conclusions of
a magistrate judge to which a party has specifically
objected. See FRCP 72(b)(3) & 28 USC §636(b)(1)(C); see
also United States v Wilson, 864 F2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir
1989, per curiam). The district court may accept any other
portions to which there’s no objection if satisfied that no
clear error appears on the face of the record. See Guillory v
PPG Industries Inc, 434 F3d 303, 308 (5th Cir 2005), citing
Douglass v United Services Automobile Association, 79 F3d
1415, 1430 (5th Cir 1996, en banc); see also FRCP 72(b)
advisory committee note (1983).
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
December 01, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:25-cv-01270 Document 75 Filed 12/01/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2
None of the parties filed objections. No clear error
otherwise appears upon review and consideration of the
Memorandum and Recommendation, the record, and the
applicable law.
The Memorandum and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Memorandum and
Order of this Court. Dkt 60.
The motion for remand is DENIED. Dkt 4.
SO ORDERED.
Signed on December 1, 2025, at Houston, Texas.
___________________________
Hon Charles Eskridge
United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-01270 Document 75 Filed 12/01/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2