4:25-cv-00971•Granados v. Commissioner of Social Security
Full text
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 03, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 1of2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 03, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION IVAN ANDRES BONILLA GRANADOS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. H-25-00971 FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, AMMMMMmMm MM mM WM Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending are Plaintiff Ivan Andres Bonilla Granados’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13) and Defendant Commissioner Frank Bisignano’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Motion (Document No. 17). The Court has received from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion be granted and Defendant’s Motion be denied and the Commissioner’s Decision be remanded for further administrative proceedings. The deadline for objections has passed, and Defendant Commissioner Bisignano has not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. The Court, having observed the implicit acquiescence of Defendant Commissioner Bisignano to the Memorandum and Recommendation, finds that the findings and recommendations of the AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 Magistrate Judge are correct and should be and hereby are accepted by the Court in their entirety. Accordingly, It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed and filed on February 4, 2026, which is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of this Court, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13) is GRANTED, Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 17) is DENIED, and the Commissioner’s Decision is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. The Clerk will enter this Order, providing a correct copy to Ah SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this ay of March, 2026. all counsel of record. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.