Granados v. Commissioner of Social Security

4:25-cv-00971TxsdMar 3, 2026

Full text

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
March 03, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 1of2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas

ENTERED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 03, 2026
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

HOUSTON DIVISION

IVAN ANDRES BONILLA GRANADOS,
Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. H-25-00971

FRANK BISIGNANO,

Commissioner of Social
Security Administration,

AMMMMMmMm MM mM WM

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending are Plaintiff Ivan Andres Bonilla Granados’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13) and Defendant Commissioner
Frank Bisignano’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Response
to Plaintiff’s Motion (Document No. 17). The Court has received
from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum and Recommendation
recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion be granted and Defendant’s
Motion be denied and the Commissioner’s Decision be remanded for
further administrative proceedings. The deadline for objections
has passed, and Defendant Commissioner Bisignano has not objected
to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation.

The Court, having observed the implicit acquiescence of
Defendant Commissioner Bisignano to the Memorandum and

Recommendation, finds that the findings and recommendations of the

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:25-cv-00971 Document 20 Filed 03/03/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Magistrate Judge are correct and should be and hereby are accepted
by the Court in their entirety. Accordingly,

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge signed and filed on February 4, 2026, which is adopted in
its entirety as the opinion of this Court, that Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13) is GRANTED, Defendant’s
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 17) is DENIED, and
the Commissioner’s Decision is REMANDED for further administrative
proceedings.

This is a FINAL JUDGMENT.

The Clerk will enter this Order, providing a correct copy to

Ah

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this ay of March, 2026.

all counsel of record.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.