4:25-cv-00764•Pratt v. Colvin Case remanded to SSA.
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHEILA P., Plaintiff, v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-25-764 ORDER This court has reviewed de novo the cross-motions for summary judgment, (Docket Entry Nos. 12, 13); the related briefing and administrative record, (Docket Entry Nos. 7, 14); and the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (Docket Entry No. 15). See FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections were filed. This court finds that the Magistrate Judge accurately identified the facts and correctly applied the law. Based on this court’s de novo review of the motion, the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Report and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 12), is granted. The Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 13), is denied. The Commissioner’s determination that the plaintiff is not disabled is reversed. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. SIGNED on February 25, 2026, at Houston, Texas. ________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Senior United States District Judge United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 25, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:25-cv-00764 Document 16 Filed 02/25/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.