4:24-cv-04578•Morgan v. O'Malley
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DIEKTRICH M. vs FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-24-4578 § § § § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION This case is before the Court for judicial review of an administrative decision (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11) seeking an order remanding the case for an award of benefits or further consideration. Defendant filed a response to Plaintiffs motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff filed a response opposing Defendant's motion (Doc. No. 20). Magistrate Judge Bray issued his Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22). Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. No. 23). The Court has carefully reviewed, de nova, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge ' s Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge ' s conclusion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. No. 23) are OVERRULED, the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22) is ADOPTED, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED, the Commissioner' s cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED, the Commissioner' s final decision is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Entry of this Order shall constitute entry of final judgment. -k'-- SIGNED this _f!__ day of March 2026. ANDREW S. HANEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 18, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 4:24-cv-04578 Document 24 Filed 03/17/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.