Thomas v. Woods et al

3:25-cv-00209TxsdDec 17, 2025

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
LAUREE THOMAS,
Plaintiff.
V.
MAJKA WOODS, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
3:25-cv-209
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On July 8, 2025, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United
States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 5. On
November 25, 2025, Judge Edison filed a memorandum opinion, order, and
recommendation in which he granted the plaintiff’s request to file a second
amended complaint and recommended denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss,
Dkt. 54, as moot. Dkt. 75 at 2.
No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation.
Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds
that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:
(1) 	Judge 	Edison’s 	memorandum 	and 	recommendation, 	Dkt. 	75, 	is
approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and
(2) 	The defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 54, is denied as moot.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
December 17, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 3:25-cv-00209 Document 78 Filed 12/17/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2
SIGNED on Galveston Island this 17th day of December, 2025.
______________________________
JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-00209 Document 78 Filed 12/17/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.