Poffenbarger v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JEFFREY POFFENBARGER,
Plaintiff,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00022
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On June 18, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 25), recommending that Plaintiff’s motion
for declaratory relief (D.E. 12) be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff was provided proper
notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Special Order No. C-2023-
1. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 25), and all other relevant
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
July 22, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:26-cv-00022 Document 28 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion for declaratory
relief (D.E. 12) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
ORDERED on July 22, 2026.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:26-cv-00022 Document 28 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2