Brock-Sellers v. Bobby Siscoe LLC, et al. The Court will not accept any filings where leave has not been granted until the date of the Initial Conference. See DE 24

2:26-cv-00020TxsdMar 27, 2026

Full text

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
March 27, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page1of2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas

ENTERED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2026
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

ANGELA M. BROCK-SELLERS,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00020

V.

BOBBY SISCOE LLC, et al.,

Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 34). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's
motion to remand. (D.E. 7).

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the Parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 34). Accordingly, the Court
GRANTS Plaintiffs motion to remand, (D.E. 7), REMANDS this case to the 156th Judicial
District Court of Bee County, Texas, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this

1/2

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Order to the same. The Court further DENIES as moot all pending motions in this case.

SO ORDERED.

x) LAK

DA\IBS. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
March 27, 2026

Li 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.