Solomon v. Guerrero

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
LEONARD MAURICE SOLOMON,
Petitioner,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00238
ERIC GUERRERO,
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On March 27, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 20), recommending that Respondent’s
motion to dismiss (D.E. 12) be granted and that this action be dismissed as barred by
limitations. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); Special Order No. C-2023-1. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 20), and all other relevant
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
April 27, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00238 Document 23 Filed 04/27/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 12) and DISMISSES this action as time barred. In
the event that Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability, that request is DENIED.
ORDERED on April 27, 2026.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00238 Document 23 Filed 04/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2