Castillo v. Warden FCI Three Rivers

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JUAN MANUEL CASTILLO, JR.,
Petitioner,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00192
WARDEN FCI THREE RIVERS,
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 17, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge” (D.E. 9),
recommending that this action be dismissed as improperly filed as a habeas corpus action.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 9), and all other relevant
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
November 19, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00192 Document 12 Filed on 11/19/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as improperly filed in the form of a habeas corpus proceeding.
ORDERED on November 19, 2025.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00192 Document 12 Filed on 11/19/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2