Wood v. Warden FCI Three Rivers

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:25-cv-00096
Document 20 Filed 01/20/26 in TXSD
Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southern District of Texas
ENTERED January 20, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
CURTIS WOOD,
Petitioner,
V.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00096
WARDEN RICHARD LUNA,
Respondent.
las las cas las cas las cas las cas § §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 17). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. Id. at 5.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge's M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 17). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment, (D.E. 16).
1/2
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Case 2:25-cv-00096
Document 20 Filed 01/20/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
SO ORDERED.
UM
DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas January 20,2026
2/ 2