1:24-cv-00172•Carrera et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Carrera et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
1:24-cv-00172TxsdFeb 23, 2026
Full text
1 / 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION BLANCA CARRERA and RAMON CUETO, Plaintiffs, VS. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-172 ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER Plaintiffs Blanca Carrera and Ramon Cueto filed this action, alleging violations of the Texas Insurance Code, fraud, and other related claims. On November 27, 2024, Defendant Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company removed the case to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction. (See Notice of Removal, Doc. 1) On April 15, 2025, Plaintiffs’ counsel was permitted to withdraw from the case. (Order, Doc. 19) Since that time, Plaintiffs have failed to attend multiple status conferences and failed to make required filings. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 32, 2) In October 2025, a United States Magistrate Judge issued a Notice and Order (Doc. 29), scheduling a hearing and requiring Plaintiffs to appear personally to show cause why their claims should not be dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the court’s Orders. Plaintiffs failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32), recommending that Plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed with prejudice. (R&R, Doc. 32) No party filed objections. “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error within it. United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 23, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 1:24-cv-00172 Document 35 Filed 02/23/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 / 2 As a result, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32). It is: ORDERED that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Plaintiff Blanco Carrera and Ramon Cueto’s causes of action are DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. This is a final and appealable order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed on February 23, 2026. ____________________________ Fernando Rodriguez, Jr. United States District Judge Case 1:24-cv-00172 Document 35 Filed 02/23/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.