Fullen v. The City of Lubbock et al

5:25-cv-00055TxndFeb 3, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
TONY FULLEN,
Plaintiff,
CITY OF LUBBOCK, et a1.,
Defendants.
No. 5:25-CV-055-H
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a
Recommendation (FCR) that the defendants' motion to quash (Dkt. No. 12) be denied as
moot. Dkt. No. 22. No objections were filed.
Where no specific objections are filed within the l4-day period, the Court reviews
the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations or y for plain error.
Serano v. Customs & Border Patol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cn.
2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court
accepts and adops the FCR. The defendants' motion to quash @kt. No. 12) is therefore
denied as moot.
So ordered on February a,2026
JAMES SLEY HENDRIX
UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00055-H Document 23 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.