5:25-cv-00055•Fullen v. The City of Lubbock et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION TONY FULLEN, Plaintiff, CITY OF LUBBOCK, et a1., Defendants. No. 5:25-CV-055-H ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the defendants' motion to quash (Dkt. No. 12) be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 22. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the l4-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations or y for plain error. Serano v. Customs & Border Patol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cn. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adops the FCR. The defendants' motion to quash @kt. No. 12) is therefore denied as moot. So ordered on February a,2026 JAMES SLEY HENDRIX UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00055-H Document 23 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.