King v. Doe 4:26-cv-92-P

4:26-cv-00092TxndMar 23, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
J EREMIAH P. KING ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:26-cv-0092-P
J OHN DOE,
Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions,
and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 5. No objections were filed,
and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The
undersigned 	District 	Judge 	reviewed 	the 	proposed 	Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the
undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the
Findings 	and 	Conclusions 	of 	the 	Court. 	Accordingly, 	this 	case 	is
DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. This is a
FINAL JUDGMENT for purposes of appeal.
SO ORDERED on this 23rd day of March 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALEA KEMP ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:23-cv-00841-P
REGIONS BANK ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion
and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.
______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:26-cv-00092-P Document 6 Filed 03/23/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.