Lombard v. Hindy et al

4:26-cv-00006TxndFeb 18, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
W ILTON L OMBARD ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:26-cv-00006-P
G ERALD HINDY , ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions,
and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 9. No objections were filed,
and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The
District 	Judge 	reviewed 	the 	proposed 	Findings, 	Conclusions, 	and
Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District
Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge 	are 	correct, 	and 	they 	are 	accepted 	as 	the 	Findings 	and
Conclusions of the Court.
The 	Court 	therefore 	ORDERS 	that 	this 	case 	is 	DISMISSED
without prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of February 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALEA KEMP ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:23-cv-00841-P
REGIONS BANK ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion
and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.
______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:26-cv-00006-P Document 10 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.