Watson v. Ragle Inc

4:25-cv-00667TxndApr 8, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
BRETT MICHAEL W ATSON ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:25-cv-00667-P
RAGLE I NCORPORATED ,
Defendant.
ORDER
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including
the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28
U.S.C. 	§ 	636(b)(1), 	the 	undersigned 	United 	States 	District 	Judge
believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge,
ECF No. 58, are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Partial
Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Counts II and III are DISMISSED
without prejudice. Counts IV through IX are DISMISSED with
prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 8th day of April 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALEA KEMP ,
Plaintiff,
v. 	No. 4:23-cv-00841-P
REGIONS BANK ET AL .,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion
and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.
______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-00667-P-BJ Document 66 Filed 04/08/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.