3:25-cv-01844•John v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAMUEL JOHN, § A#035059892, § Petitioner, § § v. § No. 3:25-CV-1844-B-BW § U.S. IMMIGRATION AND § CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, § Respondent. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, received on October 7, 2025 (Doc. 9), will be DISMISSED without prejudice as moot by separate judgment. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for an alien detainee to appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F. 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 Case 3:25-cv-01844-B-BW Document 13 Filed 02/27/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
SO ORDERED this 27th day of February, 2026. 2 Case 3:25-cv-01844-B-BW Document 13 Filed 02/27/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.