Zinkevych v. Johnson et al

3:25-cv-01149TxndFeb 2, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PAVLO ZINKEVYCH, 	§
Petitioner, 	§
§
v. 	§ 	No. 3:25-CV-1149-K-BW
§
JOSH JOHNSON, Acting Field Office 	§
Director (Dallas), Immigration and 	§
Customs Enforcement, et al., 	§
Respondents. 	§
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. (See Dkt. No. 13.) Petitioner filed Objections (Doc.
No. 14). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and
reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation
for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s habeas petition
(Dkt. No. 1), and having resolved the matter on the merits, DENIES the Motion for
TRO (Dkt. No. 10) and all other pending motions as moot.
Case 3:25-cv-01149-K-BW Document 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
2
The Court will by separate order enter judgment DISMISSING Petitioner’s
habeas claims with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Signed February 2nd
, 2026.
________________________________________
ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-01149-K-BW Document 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.