3:24-cv-02994•Dallas MDL LLC v. State Farm Lloyds
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DALLAS MDL LLC, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-2994-X MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 23 and 25). Summary judgment is appropriate only where the pleadings and evidence show “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”1 After reviewing the briefing and relevant law, “genuine dispute” of “material fact” remain such that summary judgment is inappropriate here.2 Namely, there remain factual disputes as to the cause of the damage to the concrete slab and whether State Farm investigated Dallas MDL’s claim in good faith. So the Court cannot grant summary judgment and these questions must be decided by the trier of fact. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of January, 2026. ___________________________________ BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a). 2 Id. Case 3:24-cv-02994-X Document 41 Filed 01/29/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.