Contreras-Orosco v. USA

3:24-cv-00994TxndFeb 11, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CESAR CONTRERAS-OROSCO,
#55679-177,
§
§
§
Plaintiff, 	§
§ 	No. 3:24-cv-0994-K (BK)
v. 	§
§
§
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant
§
§
§
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any
objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Because the administrative forfeiture notice requirements were sufficient in this
case, Contreras’ claims of procedural and due process violations related to the forfeiture
of $40,609.00 in U.S. currency is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, because
the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider any of Contreras’ other arguments and claims
seeking to set aside the forfeiture and return the $40,609.00 in U.S. currency,
Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Doc.
Case 3:24-cv-00994-K-BK Document 35 Filed 02/11/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
29, is GRANTED, and Contreras’ remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
SO ORDERED.
Signed February 11 th , 2026.
__________________________________________
ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:24-cv-00994-K-BK Document 35 Filed 02/11/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.