3:23-cv-02692•US Bank National Association v. Micheaux et al
Full text
-1- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION US BANK NATIONAL § ASSOCIATION, for asset backed § funding corporation asset backed § certificates 2006 HE1, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § No. 3:23-cv-2692-S-BN § FALISSA MICHEAUX, SCHNIKA § MCKISSIC, individually and as § legal guardian for E.T., NATALIE § VERSEY, TANOSHA BISHOP, § MONTOYA TARGTON, TERRY § TARGTON, JR., and TARIQ § TARGTON, § § Defendants. § ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust Company National Association, for asset backed funding corporation asset backed certificates 2006 HE1, (“U.S. Bank”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Default Judgment. See Dkt. No. 61. This case was referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge for pretrial management under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and an order of reference from United States District Judge Karen Gren Scholer. See Dkt. No. 4. The undersigned entered findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 19, 2026 [Dkt. No. 65] recommending that the Court dismiss this lawsuit without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (the “FCR”). The undersigned also Case 3:23-cv-02692-S-BN Document 67 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
-2- recommended that, if U.S. Bank provided jurisdictional evidence, the Court should deny the motion for lack of evidence of Defendants’ heirship. After entry of the FCR, U.S. Bank submitted objections, which included evidence of jurisdiction and evidence of heirship. See Dkt. No. 66. In light of the objections, the undersigned withdraws the January 19, 2026 FCR [Dkt. No. 65]. The undersigned will enter new findings of fact and conclusions of law that addresses the objections and new evidence. SO ORDERED. DATED: February 3, 2026 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DAVID L. HORAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-02692-S-BN Document 67 Filed 02/03/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.