Ross v. Risperdaul

9:24-cv-00069TxedFeb 17, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 	EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
RYAN CLARK ROSS, 	§
§
Plaintiff, 	§
§
versus 	§ 	CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24-CV-69
§
RISPERDAUL, 	§
§
Defendant. 	§
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Ryan Clark Ross, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court previously
referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, for
consideration. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge recommending that the case dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.
The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,
and all available evidence. The magistrate judge’s recommendation was based on plaintiff’s failure
to comply with an order directing him to either pay the required filing fee or submit a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis. After the Report and Recommendation was submitted, the court
granted plaintiff an extension of time to comply with the order. The time for complying with the
order has expired. Following careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#5) is
ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of February, 2026.
Case 9:24-cv-00069-MAC-CLS Document 9 Filed 02/17/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.