Daniel v. Rodriguez et al

- 1 -
No. 6:25-cv-00444
Christopher Allen Daniel,
Plaintiff,
v.
B Rodriquez et al.,
Defendants.
O R D E R
Plaintiff, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmate pro-
ceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit alleging violations of his con-
stitutional rights. Doc. 1. The case was referred to a magistrate
judge, who issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s lawsuit
be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Doc. 3 at
5. Plaintiff filed no written objections.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. All claims in this action are dismissed
with prejudice. The dismissal shall have no effect on plaintiff’s
ability to seek relief from his conviction through any lawful means
or to pursue any claims against Young County officials as he may
believe appropriate. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
So ordered by the court on February 25, 2026.
J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:25-cv-00444-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>