6:25-cv-00390•Harris v. Enriquez
Full text
- 1 - No. 6:25-cv-00390 Eugene Angelo Harris, Jr., Plaintiff, v. David Enriquez, Defendant. O R D E R Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. The case was referred to a magistrate judge, who issued a report rec- ommending that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Doc. 5 at 1. Plaintiff did not file written ob- jections to the report. When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis- fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find- ings and recommendations. The court dismisses the compliant without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Any pending motion is denied as moot. So ordered by the court on January 8, 2026. J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER United States District Judge Case 6:25-cv-00390-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.