6:25-cv-00281•Foreman v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
Full text
- 1 - No. 6:25-cv-00281 Kimberly Banfield Foreman, Plaintiff, v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, Defendant. O R D E R The court dismissed this case and entered final judgment on November 18, 2025. Doc. 31. Plaintiff moved to vacate and void judgment. Doc. 32. The magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that the court deny plaintiff’s motion to vacate. Doc. 37 at 2. Plaintiff received a copy of the report on January 12, 2026. Doc. 39. No party has filed written objections. When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis- fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find- ings and recommendations. The court denies plaintiff’s motion to vacate (Doc. 32). So ordered by the court on February 6, 2026. J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER United States District Judge Case 6:25-cv-00281-JCB-KNM Document 41 Filed 02/06/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.