Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable

- 1 -
No. 6:24-cv-00466
Felicia Walton,
Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
O R D E R
Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of the Com-
missioner’s denial of supplemental security income under the So-
cial Security Act. Doc. 1. The case was referred to a magistrate
judge, who issued a report recommending that the Commis-
sioner’s final decision be affirmed and that the complaint be dis-
missed with prejudice. Doc. 21 at 20. No party filed written ob-
jections.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. The final decision of the Commis-
sioner of the Social Security Administration is affirmed. All
claims in this matter are dismissed with prejudice. Any pending
motions are denied as moot.
So ordered by the court on February 27, 2026.
J. C AM PB EL L B A RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:24-cv-00466-JCB-KNM Document 22 Filed 02/27/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>