6:24-cv-00422•Bamburg v. Smith County Court House
Full text
- 1 - No. 6:24-cv-00422 Brenda Bamburg, Plaintiff, v. Smith County, Defendant. O R D E R Plaintiff brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 8 at 3. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. Doc. 10 at 3. The case was referred to a magistrate judge, who issued a report recommending that the court grant defend- ant’s motion to dismiss, dismiss plaintiff’s case with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and deny defendant’s request for attor- ney’s fees. Doc. 24 at 9. Neither party filed written objections. When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis- fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find- ings and recommendations. Plaintiff’s case is dismissed with prej- udice, and defendant’s request for attorney’s fees is denied. Any pending motions are denied as moot. So ordered by the court on February 4, 2026. J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER United States District Judge Case 6:24-cv-00422-JCB-KNM Document 25 Filed 02/04/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.