Ojiambo v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation

4:25-cv-01295TxedDec 21, 2025

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CATHERINE OJIAMBO
v.
FREEDOM MORTGAGE
CORPORATION
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-01295-SDJ-BD
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #19), that
Plaintiff Catherine Ojiambo’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
(Dkt. #3), be denied. Plaintiff filed Objections, (Dkt. #21), to the Report.
The Court conducted a de novo review of the Objections and the portions of the
Report to which Plaintiff specifically objects, and the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and that the Objections
are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The Court
hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings
and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #3), is
DENIED.
Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION
CATHERINE OJIAMBO §
Vv. CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-01295-SDJ-BD
FREEDOM MORTGAGE
CORPORATION

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #19), that
Plaintiff Catherine Ojiambo’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
(Dkt. #8), be denied. Plaintiff filed Objections, (Dkt. #21), to the Report.

The Court conducted a de novo review of the Objections and the portions of the
Report to which Plaintiff specifically objects, and the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and that the Objections
are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The Court
hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings
and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #8), is

DENIED.

Case 4:25-cv-01295-SDJ-BD Document 48 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of December, 2025.

SEAN 5. we
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.