USA v. Trejo-Mendoza

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ISAI TREJO MENDOZA
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
4:24-CR-258
Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the
Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to
applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and considered the Judge’s
Report, the record, pleadings and all available evidence.
At the close of the revocation hearing, Judge Zack Hawthorn recommended:
1. finding the Defendant violated the first allegation in the petition that he failed to follow
a standard condition of release;
2. revoking the Defendant’s supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and
3. sentencing the defendant to a term of 5 months’ imprisonment, with one year of
supervised release to follow. The court adopts the magistrate judge’s findings for the
imposition of the same standard, mandatory, and special conditions of supervised
release previously imposed when the Defendant was originally sentenced.
At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel, and counsel for
the Government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed
findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge’s report, consenting to
revocation of supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. The Defendant
Case 4:24-cr-00258-ALM-AGD Document 15 Filed 01/29/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
also waived his right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the court
imposes the recommended sentence.
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are
correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and Isai Trejo
Mendoza’s supervised release is REVOKED.
Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate
judge’s recommendations.
Case 4:24-cr-00258-ALM-AGD Document 15 Filed 01/29/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>