USA v. McCrandall

-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
SCOTT E. MCCRANDALL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NUMBER 1:16-CR-00070-MAC
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION FOR WARRANT
FOR OFFENDER UNDER SUPERVISION
Pending is a “Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision” filed
October 16, 2025, alleging that the Defendant, Scott E. McCrandall, violated his conditions of
supervised release. This matter is referred to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States
Magistrate Judge, for review, hearing, and submission of a report with recommended findings of
fact and conclusions of law. See United States v. Rodriguez, 23 F.3d 919, 920 n.1 (5th Cir.
1994); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3401(i) (2000); E.D. TEX. CRIM. R. CR-59.
I. The Original Conviction and Sentence
Scott E. McCrandall was sentenced on August 24, 2017, before The Honorable Marcia A.
Crone, of the Eastern District of Texas, after pleading guilty to the offense of Possession with
Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine, a Class B felony. This offense carried a statutory
maximum imprisonment term of 40 years. The guideline imprisonment range, based on a total
offense level of 29 and a criminal history category of VI, was 155 to 188 months. Scott E.
McCrandall was subsequently sentenced to 120 months’ imprisonment followed by a 5 year term
of supervised release subject to the standard conditions of release, plus special conditions to
include financial disclosure; testing and treatment for drug abuse; and a $100 special assessment.
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-2-
II. The Period of Supervision
On September 27, 2024, Scott E. McCrandall completed his period of imprisonment and
began service of the supervision term.
III. The Petition
United States Probation filed the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision
raising seven allegations. The petition alleges that Scott E. McCrandall violated the following
conditions of release:
Allegation 1. You must not commit another federal, state or local crime.
Allegation 2. You must not unlawfully possess a controlled substance.
Allegation 3. You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm,
ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon.
Allegation 4. If you are arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer, you
must notify the probation officer within 72 hours.
Allegation 5. You must refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance.
Allegation 6. You must participate in a program of testing and treatment for drug
abuse and follow the rules and regulations of that program until discharged. The
probation officer, in consultation with the treatment provider, will supervise your
participation in the program. You must pay any cost associated with treatment and
testing.
Allegation 7. You must not communicate or interact with someone you know is
engaged in criminal activity.
IV. Proceedings
On February 12, 2026, the undersigned convened a hearing pursuant to Rule 32.1 of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to hear evidence and arguments on whether the Defendant
violated conditions of supervised release, and the appropriate course of action for any such
violations.
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-3-
At the revocation hearing, counsel for the Government and the Defendant announced an
agreement as to a recommended disposition regarding the revocation. The Defendant agreed to
plead “true” to the fourth allegation that claimed he failed to notify probation officer of his
arrest. In return, the parties agreed that he should serve a term of 13 months’ imprisonment with
one year of supervised release to follow.
V. Principles of Analysis
According to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), the court may revoke a term of supervised
release and require the defendant to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release
authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in such term of supervised release without
credit for time previously served on post-release supervision, if the court, pursuant to the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure applicable to revocation of probation or supervised release, finds by
a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release,
except that a defendant whose term is revoked under this paragraph may not be required to serve
on any such revocation more than five years in prison if the offense that resulted in the term of
supervised release is a Class A felony, more than three years if such offense is a Class B felony,
more than two years in prison if such offense is a Class C or D felony, or more than one year in
any other case. The original offense of conviction was a Class B felony, therefore, the maximum
imprisonment sentence is 3 years.
According to U.S.S.G. § 7C1.1(a)1, if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence
that the Defendant violated conditions of supervision by failing to notify probation officer of his
arrest, the Defendant will be guilty of committing a Grade C violation. U.S.S.G. § 7C1.3
indicates that upon a finding of non-compliance, the court should conduct an individualized
1. All of the policy statements in Chapter 7 that govern sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release
are non-binding. See U.S.S.G. Ch. 7 Pt. A; United States v. Bradberry, 360 F. App’x. 508, 509 (5th Cir. 2009).
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-4-
assessment and that revocation is generally appropriate for a Grade A violation, often appropriate
for a Grade B violation, and may be appropriate for a Grade C violation.
U.S.S.G. § 7C1.5 provides that in the case of revocation of supervised release based on a
Grade C violation and a criminal history category of VI, the policy statement imprisonment
range is 8 to 14 months.
U.S.S.G. § 7C1.4(a) states that the court shall conduct an individualized assessment to
determine the appropriate length of the term of imprisonment, given the recommended range of
imprisonment set forth in § 7C1.5.
According to U.S.S.G. § 7C1.4(b), any term of imprisonment imposed upon the
revocation of supervised release generally should be ordered to be served consecutively to any
sentence of imprisonment that the defendant is serving, whether or not the sentence of
imprisonment being served resulted from the conduct that is the basis of the revocation of
supervised release. The Defendant’s agreed upon revocation sentence shall run consecutively to
any other term imprisonment he is serving.
According to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), when a term of supervised release is revoked and the
defendant is required to serve a term of imprisonment, the court may include a requirement that
the defendant be placed on a term of supervised release after imprisonment. The length of such a
term of supervised release shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute
for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release, less any term of
imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of supervised release. The authorized term of
supervised release for this offense is not more than Life.
U.S.S.G. § 7C1.4(c) indicates where supervised release is revoked, the court may include
a requirement that the defendant be placed on a term of supervised release upon release from
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-5-
imprisonment. The length of such a term of supervised release shall not exceed the term of
supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of
supervised release, less any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of
supervised release.
In determining the Defendant’s sentence, the court shall consider:
1. The nature and circumstance of the offense and the history and characteristics of the
defendant; see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1);
2. The need for the sentence imposed: to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct;
to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and to provide the
Defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, other
corrective treatment in the most effective manner; see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553 (a)(2)(B)-
(D);
3. Applicable guidelines and policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission,
for the appropriate application of the provisions when modifying or revoking
supervised release pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(a)(3), that are in effect on the date the
defendant is sentenced; see 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(4); see also 28 U.S.C. § 924(A)(3);
4. Any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 994(a)(2), that is in effect on the date the defendant is sentenced; see 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a)(5); and
5. The need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar
records who have been found guilty of similar conduct; see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6).
6. The need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense.
18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(e) and 3553(a).
VI. Application
The Defendant pled “true” to the petition’s allegation that he violated a standard
condition of release that he failed to notify probation officer of his arrest. Based upon the
Defendant’s plea of “true” to this allegation of the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender
Under Supervision and U.S.S.G. § 7C1.3, the undersigned finds that the Defendant violated a
condition of supervised release.
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-6-
The undersigned has carefully conducted an individualized assessment and considered
each of the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). The Defendant’s violation is a Grade C
violation, and the criminal history category is VI. The policy statement range in the Guidelines
Manual is 8 to 14 months. The Defendant did not comply with the conditions of supervision and
has demonstrated an unwillingness to adhere to conditions of supervision.
Consequently, incarceration appropriately addresses the Defendant’s violation. The
sentencing objectives of punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation along with the
aforementioned statutory sentencing factors will best be served by a prison sentence of 13
months with one year of supervised release to follow.
VII. Recommendations
The court should find that the Defendant violated the allegation in the petition that he
violated a standard condition of release by failing to notify probation officer of his arrest. The
petition should be granted, and the Defendant’s supervised release should be revoked pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3583. The Defendant should be sentenced to a term of 13 months’ imprisonment
with one year of supervised release to follow.
As stated at the final revocation hearing, without objection, the same mandatory, standard
and special conditions of supervised release previously imposed when the Defendant was
originally sentenced in this case shall be re-imposed. Such conditions are set forth in the
Judgment, and the rationale for these conditions is contained in the Defendant’s Presentence
Investigation Report.
VIII. Objections
At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel, and counsel for
the government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed
findings and recommendations contained in this report, consenting to revocation of supervised
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>

-7-
release, and consenting to the imposition of the above sentence recommended in this report
(involving all conditions of supervised release, if applicable). The Defendant also waived his
right to be present and speak and have his counsel present and speak before the district court
imposes the recommended sentence. Therefore, the court may act on this report and
recommendation immediately.
.
___________________________________
Christine L Stetson
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SIGNED this the 12th day of February, 2026.
Case 1:16-cr-00070-MAC-ZJH Document 49 Filed 02/12/26 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:
<pageID>