2:25-cv-02800•White v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION SYMARA A.C. YOUNG, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:25-cv-2799-SHL-atc No. 2:25-cv-2800-SHL-atc v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ONTARIAN MALONE, MARQUAVIUS WILLIAMS, and MARTERRION BRISCOE, Defendants. ____________________________________ SHONDA R. WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF LASUNDRA JOSEPHINE WHITE, A MINOR, and JASMINE KINDS, DECEASED MINOR, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ONTARIAN MALONE, MARQUAVIUS WILLIAMS, MARTERRION BRISCOE, and XAVIER HUNT, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS ONTARIAN MALONE, MARQUAVIUS WILLIAMS, XAVIER HUNT, AND MARTERRION BRISCOE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FROM CASE NO. 25-cv-2800 On February 9, 2026, Plaintiff Shonda R. White, individually and as mother and next friend of Lasundra Josephine White (a minor) and Jasmine Kinds (a deceased minor), and as grandmother and next friend of P.K.K. (a minor), filed a Notice of Dismissal of Defendants Case 2:25-cv-02800-SHL-tmp Document 40 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
2 Ontarian Malone, Marquavius Williams, Xavier Hunt, and Marterrion Briscoe, in Case No. 25- cv-2800-SHL-tmp. (ECF No. 81.) White asserts that dismissal is appropriate pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, in cases with multiple defendants, “Rule 21 provides the appropriate basis for dismissal of a single defendant.” Henderson-Thompson v. Jardoin, No. 2:22-cv-2013-MSN-cgc, 2022 WL 349896, at *2 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 4, 2022) (citing Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 286 F.2d 782, 785 (6th Cir. 1961)); see also Wilkerson v. Brakebill, No. 3:15-CV-435-TAV-CCS, 2017 WL 401212, at *2 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 30, 2017) (collecting district court cases from within the Sixth Circuit that recognize that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, rather than Rule 41, is applicable when dismissing a single claim or defendant rather than an entire lawsuit). Rule 21 provides that, “[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party.” Dropping parties under Rule 21 functions as a dismissal of the party. See Henderson- Thompson, 2022 WL 349896, at *2. Thus, all claims against Ontarian Malone, Marquavius Williams, Xavier Hunt, and Marterrion Briscoe are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This dismissal does not apply to White’s claims against Defendants City of Memphis or the Memphis Police Department. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of February, 2026. s/ Sheryl H. Lipman SHERYL H. LIPMAN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-02800-SHL-tmp Document 40 Filed 02/10/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.