Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. ETERNAL WELLNESS LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
NOVO NORDISK A/S AND NOVO , 	)
NORDISK INC., 	)
)
Plaintiffs, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp
)
ETERNAL WELLNESS LLC D/B/A DE LA 	)
BELLE WELLNESS & SPA, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL
JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ETERNAL WELLNESS LLC
D/B/A DE LA BELLE WELLNESS & SPA
Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Against Defendant
Eternal Wellness LLC d/b/a De La Belle Wellness & Spa, filed February 11, 2026. (ECF No.
30.) The parties explain that they “have reached an amicable settlement, whereby they have
stipulated for an entry of the Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction,” which they attached to
the Motion. (Id. at PageID 156.) Therefore, for good cause shown, and based on the consent of
the parties, the Motion is GRANTED consistent with the following terms:
It appearing that plaintiffs Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc. (collectively, “Novo
Nordisk”) filed their Complaint in this action on January 30, 2025, and served defendant Eternal
Wellness d/b/a De La Belle Wellness & Spa (“Defendant”) with the Complaint on February 11,
2025.
It further appearing that the parties have agreed to settle and resolve this matter without
further formal proceedings herein and, have consented to entry of this Order and Final Judgment
in connection with such resolution of this action; and
Case 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp Document 31 Filed 02/12/26 Page 1 of 5 PageID
<pageID>

2
The Court finding good cause therefor;
NOW, THEREFORE, by stipulation and agreement of the parties, and with the consent
of counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendant, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
1. 	This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15
U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338, and has jurisdiction over Defendant.
2. 	Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
3. 	Plaintiff Novo Nordisk’s Complaint states causes of action against Defendant for
trademark infringement, false advertising and unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of
section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and the Tennessee Consumer Protection
Act, § 47-18-101 et seq.
4. 	Without the consent of plaintiff Novo Nordisk, Defendant has engaged in
advertising, marketing, and promotion of compounded drug products purporting to contain
semaglutide that have not been approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (the “FDA”)
but are not genuine Novo Nordisk FDA-approved, semaglutide-based medicines (“Unapproved
Compounded Drugs”) that falsely suggests that: (i) the Unapproved Compounded Drugs offered
and sold by Defendant are FDA-approved and are interchangeable with or equivalent to and
contain the same semaglutide as genuine, FDA-approved Novo Nordisk medicines; (ii) the
Unapproved Compounded Drugs have been reviewed by the FDA for safety, effectiveness, or
quality or have been demonstrated to the FDA to be safe or effective for their intended use (iii)
Defendant and its Unapproved Compounded Drugs are sponsored by, associated with, or
affiliated with Novo Nordisk and Novo Nordisk’s FDA-approved, semaglutide-based medicines;
(iv) the Unapproved Compounded Drugs offered by Defendant achieve or have been shown or
Case 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp Document 31 Filed 02/12/26 Page 2 of 5 PageID
<pageID>

3
proven to achieve therapeutic results, effects, or outcomes; (v) the Unapproved Compounded
Drugs achieve or have been shown or proven to achieve therapeutic results, effects, or outcomes
similar or identical to Novo Nordisk’s FDA-approved, semaglutide-based medicines; and (vi) the
Unapproved Compounded Drugs contain any ingredient (including semaglutide) that is supplied
by Novo Nordisk, is approved by the FDA, or is the same as any ingredient in any Novo Nordisk
product.
5. 	Defendant’s actions as described above are likely to cause deception and violate
Novo Nordisk’s rights under the Lanham Act and state law.
6. 	Defendant, its officers, directors, shareholders, owners, agents, servants, and
employees, and all those in active concert or participation with them, are hereby
PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from:
(a) 	advertising, stating, or suggesting that any Unapproved Compounded
Drugs, including any Unapproved Compounded Drugs that either are available, directly
or indirectly, from or through Defendant or the use of which or access to which is
facilitated by, or with the involvement of, Defendant:
(1) 	are, or contain, genuine or authentic Novo Nordisk OZEMPIC,
WEGOVY, or RYBELSUS medicines;
(2) 	are sponsored by or associated with Novo Nordisk;
(3) 	are approved by the FDA; have been reviewed by the FDA for
safety, effectiveness, or quality; or have been demonstrated to the FDA to be safe
or effective for their intended use;
Case 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp Document 31 Filed 02/12/26 Page 3 of 5 PageID
<pageID>

4
(4) 	achieve or have been shown or proven to achieve therapeutic
results, effects, or outcomes, including by relying on or making reference to
clinical trial results for Novo Nordisk’s medicines;
(5) 	achieve or have been shown or proven to achieve therapeutic
results, effects, or outcomes similar or identical to Novo Nordisk’s medicines or
are interchangeable with or equivalent to genuine Novo Nordisk medicines;
(6) 	are associated or connected with Novo Nordisk or Novo Nordisk’s
medicines; or
(7) 	contain any ingredient (including semaglutide) that is supplied by
Novo Nordisk, is approved by the FDA, or is the same as any ingredient in any
Novo Nordisk medicine.
7. 	IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for twelve months from the date of entry of
this Order and Final Judgment, Defendant shall conspicuously and prominently disclose in any
materials for any Unapproved Compounded Drugs, including all advertising, marketing, and
promotional materials, that: (a) the Unapproved Compounded Drugs are compounded drugs that
have not been approved by the FDA; have not been reviewed by the FDA for safety,
effectiveness, or quality; and have not been demonstrated to the FDA to be safe or effective for
their intended use; (b) the processes by which the compounded drugs are manufactured have not
been reviewed by the FDA; and (c) FDA approved products containing semaglutide are
available.
8. 	The parties having agreed to a confidential settlement agreement that resolves
Novo Nordisk’s claims, no award is included in this Order and Final Judgment.
Case 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp Document 31 Filed 02/12/26 Page 4 of 5 PageID
<pageID>

5
9. 	Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff Novo Nordisk as set forth above.
All claims asserted in this action will be dismissed without prejudice, except that this Court shall
retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement, this Order and
the Final Judgment, and as otherwise provided herein. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.
of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381–82 (1994).
10. 	In accordance with the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1116, the Clerk of Court shall
notify the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office of the entry of this Order and Final
Judgment, who shall enter it on the records of the Patent and Trademark Office.
11. 	This Order and Final Judgment shall be deemed to have been served on
Defendant, its officers, directors, shareholders, owners, agents, servants, and employees, and all
those in active concert or participation with them as of the date of entry hereof by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 12th day of February, 2026.
s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-02098-SHL-tmp Document 31 Filed 02/12/26 Page 5 of 5 PageID
<pageID>