3:23-cv-00343•Blount v. Whole Foods Market Downtown Nashville
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ALIVIA BLOUNT, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:23-cv-00343 ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court rules as follows: 1. Whole Foods’s second objection to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) be denied (Doc. No. 172) is SUSTAINED; 2. Whole Foods’s remaining objections (Doc. No. 172) and Blount’s objections (Doc. No. 156) are OVERRULED AS MOOT; 3. The R&R (Doc. No. 155) is not accepted; 4. Whole Foods’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) is GRANTED; 5. Blount’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 125) and Whole Foods’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 154) are DENIED AS MOOT; 6. The upcoming pretrial conference, trial, and all related deadlines are CANCELLED; and 7. All other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 162–64, 66–69, 183–95, 202 and 213) are DENIED AS MOOT. Case 3:23-cv-00343 Document 217 Filed 11/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-00343 Document 217 Filed 11/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.