3:12-ap-00053•DE LA ROSA MACAS et al v. MAZA & GREEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW et al
DE LA ROSA MACAS et al v. MAZA & GREEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW et al
3:12-ap-00053PrbJun 4, 2012
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO IN RE: ANA C. DE LA ROSA MACAS RAFAEL TORRES LAUREANO CASE NO. 07-05185 BKT DEBTORS _____________________________________ Chapter 13 ANA C. DE LA ROSA MACAS RAFAEL TORRES LAURAENO PLAINTIFFS ADV. NO.: 12-053 VS. MAZA GREEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW, ET ALS. FILED & ENTERED ON 06/04/2012 DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendants' Motion requesting substantive consolidation (Dkt No. 23), is hereby DENIED. The adversary complaints which Defendants seek to consolidate do not involve the same or even related debtors, as set forth in Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1015. Moreover, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), made applicable to these proceedings by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7042, the Court may consolidate, for joint hearing or trial, actions involving common question of law or fact. Defendants, as the party moving for consolidation, bear the burden of persuading the Court that consolidation is desirable by showing the commonality of factual and legal issues in the different actions. See MacAlister v. Guterma, 263 F.2d 65, 70 (2d Cir. 1958). The complaints and claims for relief are grounded on alleged collection efforts by Defendants which purportedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the automatic stay orders in each of the cases. However, while the cases may involve some similar questions of law or facts, Defendants have made no showing that these cases are sufficiently related to warrant consolidation. Furthermore, no appreciable saving of time or expense will result from the consolidation vis a vis the possible delay or prejudice involved in consolidation. Case:12-00053-MCF Doc#:24 Filed:06/04/12 Entered:06/04/12 09:13:23 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. San Juan, Puerto Rico this 04 day of June, 2012. Brian K. Tester U.S. Bankruptcy Judge CC: ALL CREDITORS Case:12-00053-MCF Doc#:24 Filed:06/04/12 Entered:06/04/12 09:13:23 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.