Stephens v. Trump

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GLENN STEPHENS,
Plaintiff
v.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP,
Defendant
No. 4:25cv2356
(Judge Munley)
(Magistrate Judge Latella)
■ ••••••• ■ •• ■ • ■ • ■ •• ■ •••••••••••••••• ■ ••••• ■ ••••••••••• • ••••• ■ • •• • •• •••••••••• • • ■ •••••••• ■ ••••••• ■ ••• ■ ••• • ■ •••
• • ■ • ■ • ■ • ■ •• • •••••• • •••••••••• • ••••••••• ■ ••••••••••• ■ •••••• ■ • ■ •• ■ •••• ■ ••••••• • ••• ■ ••••• ■ •• ■ ■ ■ ••••••••••••• ■ ••
ORDER
Before the court is a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") from Magistrate
Judge Leo A. Latella , which recommends dismissal of Plaintiff Glenn Stephens's
complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Doc. 7).
The R&R was issued on December 30 , 2025. 	No objections to the R&R
have been filed and the time for such filing has passed. 	The R&R is thus ready
for review.
In deciding whether to adopt an R&R when no timely objections are filed ,
the court must determine if a review of the record evidences plain error or
manifest injustice. FED . R. CIv. P. 72(b), 1983 Advisory Committee Notes ("When
no timely objection is filed , the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record to accept the recommendation"); see also 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Sullivan v. Cuyler, 723 F.2d 1077, 1085 (3d Cir. 1983).
Case 4:25-cv-02356-JKM Document 8 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2

After reviewing plaintiff's complaint, the court finds neither clear error on the
face of the record nor a manifest injustice in Magistrate Judge Latella's analysis ,
and therefore, the court will accept the R&R and adopt it in its entirety.
Stephens's complaint will be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1) The R&R, (Doc. 7) , is ADOPTED ;
2) Plaintiff Glenn Stephens's complaint, (Docs. 1, 1-1 ), is DISMISSED with
prejudice; and
3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
2
Case 4:25-cv-02356-JKM Document 8 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2