Holton v. United States of America

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RUBEN CONJI HOLTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
CIVIL NO. 4:22-CV-00487
(NEARY, J.)
(LATELLA, M.J.)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2025, for the reasons
stated in the Memorandum filed simultaneously herewith, it is
HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request to compel the production
of discovery (Doc. 38) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART
as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s request to compel discovery (Doc. 38) is GRANTED
ONLY as to the requested performance evaluations. Defendant
is HEREBY ORDERED to produce the performance
evaluations for Bret Brosious, Ellen-Mace-Liebson, and Mary
Spiese. Defendant may redact all information in those reviews
with the exception of information stating whether those
individuals did or did not satisfactorily perform their duties.
Defendant is directed to produce the documents on or before
December 5, 2025.
Case 4:22-cv-00487-KMN Document 61 Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2

2
2. Plaintiff’s request to compel the production of discovery (Doc.
38) is DENIED in all other respects.
3. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend his response to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment based upon the
discovery received, he must file an amended response on or
before January 2, 2026.
/s/ Leo A. Latella
Leo A. Latella
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 4:22-cv-00487-KMN Document 61 Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2