Balestier-Marrero v. Booher et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:25-cv-02155-JKM-MP Document7 Filed 03/17/26 Page 1of1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARLOS MANUEL BALESTIER- : No. 3:25-CV-2155
MARRERO, :
Petitioner
(Judge Munley)
Vv.
BRADLEY BOOHER,

Respondent

ROPE RECOUCOCOU COU CR CCRC CEC COS ECP Cee eee eee eee eee eee eee ee eee eee eee eee
oO PP PPC PCCP CCCP eee eee ee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee

AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS

ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner Carlos Manuel Balestier-Marrero’s petition for a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED.

2. Acertificate of appealability shall not issue, as Balestier-Marrero has
failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it
debatable” whether this court’s procedural ruling is correct, Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

ibe 4 | al

JUDG JULIA K. MUN
nited States Distri urt