Doe v. Rivera et al

3:23-cv-01066PamdFeb 13, 2026

Full text

Case 3:23-cv-01066-JKM Document 85 Filed 02/13/26 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:23-cv-01066-JKM Document 85 Filed 02/13/26 Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:23-cv-01066-JKM Document 85 Filed 02/13/26 Page 1 of2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JANE DOE, : No. 3:23cv1066
Plaintiff :
(Judge Munley)
Vv.
CRYSTAL RIVERA and MONROE

COUNTY,
Defendants

oN onnER

AND NOW, to wit, Hide ey of February 2026, for the reasons set forth
in an accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) Defendants Monroe County and Crystal Rivera’s motion for summary
judgment, (Doc. 70), is GRANTED in part as to Plaintiff Jane Doe’s
procedural due process claim against Defendant Crystal Rivera;

2) Rivera is immune from suit and dismissed as a defendant in this action;

3) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED;

4) Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, (Doc. 73), is GRANTED in
part as to her procedural due process claim against Monroe County;

5) Plaintiff's motion is otherwise DENIED;

6) The Clerk of Court is direct to enter judgments in accordance with this

order; and

Case 3:23-cv-01066-JKM Document 85 Filed 02/13/26 Page 2 of 2

7) By way of separate order, this matter will be scheduled for a pretrial

conference regarding a trial on plaintiff's damages.

: pare “C8

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.