Richard v. Harry et al

1:26-cv-00122PamdOct 14, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RYAN RICHARD,
Petitioner,
v.
LAUREL R. HARRY, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:26-CV-00122
Judge Jennifer P. Wilson
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 14th day of October 2026, for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The amended petition, Doc. 9, is DISMISSED as untimely.
2. 	Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc.
10, is DENIED as moot.
3. 	Petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel, Doc. 11, is DENIED.
4. 	A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.
5. 	This case remains CLOSED.
s/Jennifer P. Wilson
JENNIFER P. WILSON
United States District Judge
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Case 1:26-cv-00122-JPW-EW Document 13 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.