Proctor v. Susquehanna Township Borough et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY E. PROCTOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP
BOROUGH, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:24-CV-02008
Judge Jennifer P. Wilson
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 17 th day of February, 2026, in accordance with the
accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1) Plaintiff’s objection, Doc. 13, is OVERRULED.
2) The report and recommendation, Doc. 12, is ADOPTED.
3) Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 11, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
without leave to amend except as to two claims: Plaintiff’s false arrest
claim against the police officers and relevant municipality is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s ability to
pursue that claim after his criminal case is resolved, and Plaintiff’s
claim for retaliation and access to the courts against Dauphin County
Prison employees is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
Plaintiff’s ability to pursue those claims in a separate action.
4) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
s/Jennifer P. Wilson
JENNIFER P. WILSON
United States District Judge
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Case 1:24-cv-02008-JPW Document 15 Filed 02/17/26 Page 1 of 1