Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIGUEL HERNANDEZ OJEDA,
v.
JAMISON, J.L., et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 26-7628
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2026, upon consideration of Petitioner Miguel
Hernandez Ojeda’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 1) and the Government’s
response (Dkt. No. 4), it is ORDERED:
1. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED;
2. The Government shall RELEASE Petitioner from custody immediately and shall
certify compliance with this Order and accompanying Memorandum by filing on the
docket no later than 5:00 P.M. EDT on Thursday, October 15, 2026;
3. In doing so, the Government shall not subject Petitioner to any conditions of release
including the imposition of any and all GPS monitoring technology or devices that he
was not subject to before his current detention;
4. The Government shall return Petitioner’s personal property that it seized during his
arrest and detention including his personal identification and documents;
5. The Government is temporarily enjoined from re-detaining Petitioner for seven days
following his release from custody;
6. If, after the seven-day period, the Government chooses to pursue re-detention of
Petitioner, it must first provide him with a bond hearing, at which a neutral immigration
judge shall determine whether detention is warranted pending the resolution of his
removal proceedings;
Case 2:26-cv-07628-JS Document 7 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 2

2
7. Pending the ordered bond hearing, the Government cannot remove, transfer, or
otherwise facilitate the removal of Petitioner from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
If the immigration judge determines that Petitioner is subject to detention under 8
U.S.C. § 1226(a), the Government may request permission from this Court to move
Petitioner if unforeseen or emergency circumstances arise that require him to be
transferred from the District. Any such request must include an explanation for the
request as well as a proposed destination. The Court will then determine whether to
grant the request and permit the transfer of Petitioner; and
8. In the event of release after a bond hearing, the Government shall not subject Petitioner
to conditions of release that are inconsistent with the exact terms as set by the
Immigration Judge after the bond hearing, including the imposition of any and all GPS
monitoring technology or devices.
It is further ORDERED that, upon receipt of the Government’s certification of compliance
with this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Case 2:26-cv-07628-JS Document 7 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 2