5:25-cv-01489•Johnson et al v. Anderson et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ELIJAH JOHNSON, individually, and as ) Natural Parent of A.J., a minor child, C.J., ) a minor child, H.J., a minor child, and E.J., ) a minor child, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1489-SLP ) STANLEY ANDERSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) O R D E R Before the Court is Defendant LB Horton, LLC’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4]. Subsequent to the filing of Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10]. “The [A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint, supersedes the original complaint’s allegations[.]” May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229 (10th Cir. 2019). Thus, those allegations are of “no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, LB Horton, LLC’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2026. Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ELIJAH JOHNSON, individually, and as ) Natural Parent of A.J., a minor child, C.J., ) ) a minor child, H.J., a minor child, and E.J., a minor child, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) STANLEY ANDERSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant LB Horton, LLC's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4]. Subsequent to the filing of Defendant's Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10]. "The [A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint, supersedes the original complaint's allegations[.]" May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229 (10th Cir. 2019). Thus, those allegations are of "no legal effect." Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, LB Horton, LLC's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2026. Satt 2 Pulk SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO ) Case No. CIV-25-1489-SLP V. Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.