Love v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al

5:25-cv-00913OkwdNov 14, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CORDELL LOVE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-913-SLP
)
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, )
LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION )
SOLUTIONS, INC., )
)
Defendants. )
O R D E R
On November 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed what purports to be his Amended Complaint
[Doc. No. 15]. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) allows amendments as a matter
of course if filed (A) within 21 days of service of the original pleading or (B) within 21
days after the earlier of service of a responsive pleading or service of a motion made under
Rule 12(b), (e), or (f)—when the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required.
Neither scenario for amendment as a matter of course is present in this case.
Rule 15(a)(2) allows amendment of a pleading with (i) the opposing party’s written
consent or (ii) leave of the Court. Here, Plaintiff has not indicated that consent of the
opposing party/parties has been given in writing. Nor has the Court granted Plaintiff leave
to file an amended pleading. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 15]
is STRICKEN because it was not filed in compliance with Rule 15(a).1
1 If consent of the opposing party/parties in writing is given for Plaintiff to file an amended
pleading, Plaintiff must so indicate in his amended pleading. This order is made without
Case 5:25-cv-00913-SLP Document 16 Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2025.
prejudice to Plaintiff filing an amended complaint with consent of the opposing
party/parties.
Case 5:25-cv-00913-SLP Document 16 Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.