Crockett v. Drummond et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
PAULA CROCKETT, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-697-G
)
GENTER DRUMMOND, Oklahoma )
Attorney General, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Plaintiff Paula Crockett, appearing pro se, initiated this civil action on June 23,
2025, raising claims against three defendants. See Compl. (Doc. No. 1). After two
defendants moved to dismiss (Doc. No. 12), Plaintiff filed an Amended Objection (Doc.
No. 15). Five days later, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Objection (Doc. No. 16).
Defendant Walgreens Store #4673 now moves to strike the Second Amended
Objection, arguing that the filing is a surreply filed without authorization from the Court.
See Def.’s Mot. to Strike (Doc. No. 18). Plaintiff has not responded to the Motion to Strike
within the time allowed by the Court’s Local Rules.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(h), “[s]upplemental briefs may be filed only upon
motion and leave of court.” LCvR 7.1(h). And pro se parties must “follow the same rules
of procedure” as other litigants. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836,
840 (10th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Case 5:25-cv-00697-G Document 19 Filed 10/15/25 Page 1 of 2

2
Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 18) therefore is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Objection (Doc. No. 16) is hereby STRICKEN from the case
record.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2025.
Case 5:25-cv-00697-G Document 19 Filed 10/15/25 Page 2 of 2