Armstrong v. United States of America

5:25-cv-00500OkwdJan 5, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
IESHA NICOLE ARMSTRONG, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-500-SLP
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Defendant. )
O R D E R
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States
Magistrate Judge Amanda L. Maxfield [Doc. No. 27]. The Magistrate Judge recommends
that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s last remaining claim1 because Plaintiff has failed to state
a viable claim under the FTCA. Id. at 4-5. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of her
right to object to the R&R and directed that any objections be filed on or before November
12, 2025. Id. at 10. No objection has been filed, nor has an extension of time in which to
object been sought or granted.
Upon review, the Court fully concurs with the analysis set forth in the R&R.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 27] is ADOPTED in its entirety
and this action is DISMISSED. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
1 Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West
Virginia. [Doc. No. 1]. The Court for the Northern District of West Virginia dismissed Claims
One through Four, and transferred the remaining claim to this Court. [Doc. No. 18]
Case 5:25-cv-00500-SLP Document 28 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2026.
Case 5:25-cv-00500-SLP Document 28 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.