Frederick v. Hamilton et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JOSEPH FREDERICK, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-24-847-SLP
)
CASEY HAMILTON, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
O R D E R
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States
Magistrate Judge Chris M. Stephens [Doc. No. 18]. 	The Magistrate Judge recommends
that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to complete
service in compliance with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for
failure to comply with the Court’s prior Orders [Doc. Nos. 16, 17]. 	See R&R [Doc. No.
18] at 1-2. 	The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of his right to object to the R&R and
directed that any objections be filed on or before December 29, 2025. 	Id. at 4. 	Plaintiff
was further advised that any failure to object would waive Plaintiff’s right to appellate
review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the R&R. 	Id. 	No objection has been
filed, nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore,
the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the R&R.
See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).
Upon review, the Court fully concurs with the analysis set forth in the R&R.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 18] is ADOPTED and this action
Case 5:24-cv-00847-SLP Document 19 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2

2
is DISMISSED without prejudice. 	A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of January, 2026.
Case 5:24-cv-00847-SLP Document 19 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2