5:23-cv-00735•Paycom Payroll LLC v. Pay.Com US Inc et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PAYCOM PAYROLL, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-735-G ) PAY.COM US, INC. d/b/a PAY.COM ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff’s original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 30). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2024. Case 5:23-cv-00735-G Document 41 Filed 05/24/24 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.