Terry et al v. City of Oklahoma City Oklahoma et al

5:22-cv-00522OkwdSep 26, 2023

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
SINCERE TERRY et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-22-522-G
)
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, )
OKLAHOMA, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Now before the Court are a Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 29) and two Motions to
Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 32, 35), filed regarding Plaintiffs’ original Complaint (Doc. No. 1).
Plaintiffs have now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 39). Plaintiffs’
Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect.
See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991).
Accordingly, the pending Motions (Doc. Nos. 29, 32, 35) are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2023.
Case 5:22-cv-00522-G Document 54 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.