David v. Crow et al

5:21-cv-00534OkwdAug 12, 2022

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JEROME ADRIAN DAVID, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-21-534-SLP
)
SCOTT CROW, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
O R D E R
Before the Court is the Third Supplemental Report and Recommendation [Doc. No.
97] of United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Judge Purcell advised Plaintiff of
his right to file an objection and further advised Plaintiff that failure to do so would result
in a waiver of appellate review of the recommended ruling. A review of the Court’s docket
shows that Plaintiff has not timely filed an objection to the Supplemental Report and
Recommendation, nor has he sought any further extension of time within which to do so.
Therefore, the Third Supplemental Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 77] is
ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Joe Allbaugh are dismissed without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of August, 2022.
Case 5:21-cv-00534-SLP Document 114 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.