3:25-cv-00382•Puckett v. Cross River Bank et al
Full text
IN THE UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISIONAT DAYTON REBECCA PUCKETT CASE NO. 3:25-CV-382 Plaintiff, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE V. CROSS RIVER BANK AND SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL LLC d/b/a SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDEREDthat this action is hereby DISMISSED,with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intendingto preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U. S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 23 February 2026 WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case: 3:25-cv-00382-WHR-CHG Doc #: 19 Filed: 02/23/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.