Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable

3:25-cv-00076OhsdFeb 25, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
EDISON C.,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:25-cv-76
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 	Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 10); (2) DISMISSING WITH
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 5); AND (3) TERMINATING THIS
CASE ON THE DOCKET
______________________________________________________________________________
This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry (Doc. No. 10), to whom this case
was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 	Judge Gentry recommends that Plaintiff’s pro se
complaint be dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. 	Noting that no objections have
been filed and that the time for filing objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, and having
carefully considered this matter,1 the Court concludes that the R&R sets forth the applicable law
and is well reasoned. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the R&R is ADOPTED; (2)
Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 5) is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution; and
(3) this case is TERMINATED on the docket.
1 The Court has liberally construed in Plaintiff’s favor his pro se complaint and the documents attached
thereto. Doc. No. 5; see Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).
Case: 3:25-cv-00076-MJN-CHG Doc #: 11 Filed: 02/25/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court CERTIFIES that an appeal of this Order would
not be taken in good faith and, therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma
pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 25, 2026 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-00076-MJN-CHG Doc #: 11 Filed: 02/25/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.